Chapter
Three of Integrating Differentiated
Instruction & Understanding acts was a great overview and manual to the
Understanding by Design process. The aspects of state learning standards I
think are relatively unknown to most individuals; in and of itself the career
of teaching is surrounded by misconceptions. I myself was ill informed of the bureaucratic
nature of standards; the more I delve into the topic the more overwhelmed I
become by the complexity and serious nature of them. To add fuel to the fire
these standards are ever evolving, making them difficult to stay on top of. This
chapter’s blunt “you can’t please them all” attitude did seem to take the edge
off a bit. I took many Advance Placement classes in high school and was always
amazed at the “teach to the test” approach many of my teachers took. Key ideas
or topics were overlooked due to the probability of them not being mentioned on
the exam. We as students acted as guinea pigs, trained for the soul purpose of
getting a high score on this one exam. I find these actions to go against every
philosophy of teaching.
The
information I was the most appreciative of however, was in the instruction of UbD
use in conjunction with the standards. This pairing dissolves the rigidity of state
dictations and allows there to be some movement, benefiting both the learner
and the teacher. It also answers to the question posed in the beginning of the
chapter in regards to time management and content overview.
No comments:
Post a Comment